Re: Modification to DA0339/16 proposing to remove two trees (Trees 61 and 62
I am writing to voice my objection to the proposed removal of trees 61 and 62 at 133A Livingstone avenue Pymble.
Removal of the subject trees was already refused at previous DA submission, and should not now be permitted via an amendment, for reasons purely of the convenience of the construction.
The removal of these two established trees for a driveway is unnecessary when there is ample room to accommodate them. Replacement “with shrubs” as per the proposal is insufficient. The established tree canopy in the Ku Ring Gai area must be protected, and directly impacts the local bird and native mammal populations. A large number of mature trees have already been removed from this site.
I would further like to raise concerns about how the removal of these trees affects the shade and privacy of adjoining properties, and the risk for ground subsidence following the removal of their large root systems. No information has been provided about the impact of their removal at all.
I ask that the proposed amendment to DA0339/16 be refused by council.
Your comment and details will be sent to
Ku-ring-gai Council.
They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application.
Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.
This independent project is run by a local charity, the
OpenAustralia Foundation.
PlanningAlerts is powered by small, tax-deductible donations from the people who use it to stay informed about changes to their
local area. If you find it useful, chip in to support PlanningAlerts.
1 Comment
Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.
Have your say on this application
Your comment and details will be sent to Ku-ring-gai Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.
Create an account or sign in to make a comment