264 The Esplanade, Miami QLD 4220

Material Change of Use Impact Assessment Multiple Dwelling x47 including Short-term Accomodation x8

External link Read more information

We found this application for you on the planning authority's website 2 months ago. It was received by them 1 day earlier.

(Source: Gold Coast City Council, reference MCU/2019/538)

4 Comments

Have your say by adding your own comment.

  1. Dorothy and Milton Howard commented

    My husband and I own timeshare at Mariner Shores next to this proposed building and the shading from this development will impact greatly on the resort with the swimming pool, mini golf and bocce all reduced to living in the shadows from this monolith. Natural light will be reduced to this area and the roof top barbecue area will also be much more darker and shadowed. Please show some commonsense and consideration for the timeshare owners who wish to enjoy these ammenities and not have them reduced to dark shadowy areas lacking in natural light

  2. Sue McCrossin commented

    Yet another totally inappropriate development, heigh, size and density - for The Esplanade, a small street that is becoming overcrowded with new developments and choking under the pressure.

  3. Bruce Barbour commented

    This is yet another example of a totally inappropriate development application for The Esplanade.
    Over scale and too high, inconsistent with the city plan - yet still they apply. Why ? Because council is likely to approve it.
    Council doesn’t care about its residents. It doesn’t want to enforce its own plan. It doesn’t care about its constituents. It’s all about development and making money.
    Who cares about quality of life. Who cares about mental health and well being.
    The only motivating factor for council is more development and more revenue.
    Let’s vote them out and let’s challenge their decisions. It is very clear they are not being made in the public interest - they are being made for improper purposes.
    Let’s all complain to the CCC and ask for these developments to be the subject of a corruption investigation.

  4. Eollyn Cortes commented

    This development does not support the local plan. This would overshadow the nearby buildings including Mariner Shores, the North Burleigh Surf Club and the beach. This will also block the view that Burleigh Surf tenants currently have of Surfers Paradise. The impact would be significant on the surrounding buildings and businesses, less people will attend the surf club and the beach when shaded and the holiday makers will go elsewhere or sell their investment if they do not maintain the space, view and light they invested in. The Esplanade cannot support more traffic and the area will be too congested. The proposed overcrowding of The Esplanade will ruin the beauty and community feel of Burleigh Heads which is what the local plan means to protect.

  1. Have you made a donation or gift to a Councillor or Council employee? You may need to disclose this.

  2. Please use your real full name if possible.

  1. We never display your street address. Why do you need my address?

This week

Find PlanningAlerts useful?

This independent project is run by a local charity, the OpenAustralia Foundation. PlanningAlerts is powered by small, tax-deductible donations from the people who use it to stay informed about changes to their local area. If you find it useful, chip in to support PlanningAlerts.

Back PlanningAlerts