PlanningAlerts

2 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. The 1.5m boundary is a compromise on the current 1.8m boundaries.
   Any reduction in the boundary width will adversely affect both the light and the privacy of the affected neighbours (#50 and #46). This will create a bad precedent, and the current covenants have already been compromised.
   As I presented to Council, every second set of semi have lounge open (per #50) and 2 bedroom on the perimeter to the next house. So by compromising the width #50 will loose privacy as #46-48 will look straight into the bedroom and lounge room. Current house design honours the privacy.
   And the current widths allows the morning sun to shine into #50, this will be adversely affected, and loss of light and privacy will result from any more changes.
   A bad precedent for a purposely designed street/original estate.

2. Further to my previous objection regarding widths, the boundaries were decided by the independent panel after a hearing and this is modification seems to be an attempt to get around that ruling.

   The slab has already been laid. I suggest Council inspect ASAP, and if necessary, to have a stop to construction until it is ripped up/modified in accordance to the consent plan.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Waverley Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment