570 New Canterbury Road, Hurlstone Park NSW

Description
Section 96(1a) the removal of enclosed court yards on level six units 6.01, 6.02, 6.03 and increase gfa of 80.66mtr
Planning Authority
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury)
View source
Reference number
DA-66/2015/A
Date sourced
We found this application on the planning authority's website on , about 10 years ago. It was received by them earlier.
Notified
271 people were notified of this application via Planning Alerts email alerts
Comments
3 comments made here on Planning Alerts

Save this search as an email alert?

Create an account or sign in.

It only takes a moment.

Public comments on this application

3

Comments made here were sent to Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury). Add your own comment.

What is the purpose of this removal? That is he big question. This development has been to Land & Environment Court. This development is in contravention to public opinion. How is it that a significant alteration can be submitted after the event. These units have been sold off the plan, a plan that at the time was not approved. Have the purchasers been advised? Canterbury Council do not permit for documentation to be viewed on line like Marrickville Council. How do we obtain this information when it is only available during business hours.

Kelly Wratten
Sent to Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury)

Section 96 amendments to DAs have been used by developers for years to sneak in enlargements to developments which were not originally approved. Unfortunately reforms to planning legislation introduced since 2011 by the Baird Govt have made the situation much worse for residents. We will have less and less say, and less and less access to documents and information in the name of increasing urban density to allow for urban growth across all of Sydney. With the amalgamation of Councils and the increased powers of the state govt to override councils' decisions, residents will be increasingly disempowered. What is happening on Canterbury Rd is a portent of the future. There is legislation going through the upper house this week or next. You could try lobbying the opposition and independents to get it stopped.

Gina Richter
Sent to Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury)

This application is aimed at increasing the ground floor space on a site already densely developed. Such extensions to the original DA suggest that the developer has originally applied for approval with every intention of modifying it. This increase in floor area provides profit. To the developer without adding to their costs.
I urge council to consider this as a precedent and refuse this DA. Future developers on even more sensitive sites than this one will utilise the same tactics.

Margaret Martin
Sent to Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury)

Add your own comment