570 New Canterbury Road, Hurlstone Park NSW

Section 96(1a) the removal of enclosed court yards on level six units 6.01, 6.02, 6.03 and increase gfa of 80.66mtr

External link Read more information

We found this application for you on the planning authority's website ago. It was received by them earlier.

(Source: Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury), reference DA-66/2015/A)

3 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

  1. Kelly Wratten commented

    What is the purpose of this removal? That is he big question. This development has been to Land & Environment Court. This development is in contravention to public opinion. How is it that a significant alteration can be submitted after the event. These units have been sold off the plan, a plan that at the time was not approved. Have the purchasers been advised? Canterbury Council do not permit for documentation to be viewed on line like Marrickville Council. How do we obtain this information when it is only available during business hours.

  2. Gina Richter commented

    Section 96 amendments to DAs have been used by developers for years to sneak in enlargements to developments which were not originally approved. Unfortunately reforms to planning legislation introduced since 2011 by the Baird Govt have made the situation much worse for residents. We will have less and less say, and less and less access to documents and information in the name of increasing urban density to allow for urban growth across all of Sydney. With the amalgamation of Councils and the increased powers of the state govt to override councils' decisions, residents will be increasingly disempowered. What is happening on Canterbury Rd is a portent of the future. There is legislation going through the upper house this week or next. You could try lobbying the opposition and independents to get it stopped.

  3. Margaret Martin commented

    This application is aimed at increasing the ground floor space on a site already densely developed. Such extensions to the original DA suggest that the developer has originally applied for approval with every intention of modifying it. This increase in floor area provides profit. To the developer without adding to their costs.
    I urge council to consider this as a precedent and refuse this DA. Future developers on even more sensitive sites than this one will utilise the same tactics.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Canterbury). They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment

This week

Find PlanningAlerts useful?

This independent project is part of the digital library from the local charity, the OpenAustralia Foundation. PlanningAlerts is powered by small donations from the people who use it to stay informed about changes to their local area. If you find it useful, chip in to support PlanningAlerts.

Back PlanningAlerts