155 Mitchell Road Erskineville NSW 2043

Description
Amending Concept Development Application to amend the Concept Consent (D/2015/966) relating to buildings F&I and G&H only, to convert the residential component to Build-to-Rent and to provide affordable housing, and modify building envelopes.
Planning Authority
City of Sydney
View source
Reference number
D/2025/448
Date sourced
We found this application on the planning authority's website on , 6 months ago. It was received by them earlier.
Notified
647 people were notified of this application via Planning Alerts email alerts
Comments
2 comments made here on Planning Alerts

Save this search as an email alert?

Create an account or sign in.

It only takes a moment.

Public comments on this application

2

Comments made here were sent to City of Sydney. Add your own comment.

Looking at this development I see that each time they build a building they get permission to increase the hight and then for the next building they put in a DA to increase the next one

So now the building on the corner of Mitchell and Couslon has gone up to 11 stories
I feel this is excessive and do NOT support this amendment

There are no set backs from the street and no green areas in between the buildings like in the buildings on Mitchell and Ashmore

This should not be allowed to proceed

Shane A Turner
Delivered to City of Sydney

The proposed amendements do not even comply with the significant 143% increase in maximum height bonus and is not in keeping with the original concept plan approved by council.

The height plane is intended for the total building height and to suggest non-residential uses exceeding this height are less important is misleading.

Increased building seperation is not demonstrated with the increased height above the previously approved 8 storeys. This should be demonstrated in the envelope plans and embeded in the approval as the current proposal suggests a greater massing/FSR than is achievable on the site. Relying on privacy screens in subesquent detailed proposals is not an acceptable solution and will guarantee poor outcomes for the development and residents.

Greater justification for the significant street wall height modification is required. The amendments are not consistent with the intent of the original concept plan in which street walls are reduced to mediate scale. The mitchell road interface for example is not consistent with the original intent to transition to the lower densisty adjoining properties. The street wall datum from the development to the north should be maintained.

Wall height views at sky level are not adequate and misleading and should be a street level. Solar anaylsis of the public domain comparing approved DA with modifiation is required.

There is insufficient design justification for the amendments and is not consistent with the design objections of the previous approval and council DCP.

Matt
Delivered to City of Sydney

Add your own comment