PlanningAlerts

3 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I reside and I am the owner of No 7 Delta Crt Cranbourne.
   For another dwelling to come in to the court is bad enought let alone on small block is totally Wrong altogether .
   Space is a big issue parking it is bad enough now if we have vistors or work being down on our homes.
   We have parking problems with envents on at the soccer grounds. If we need The Police Ambos CFA etc best of luck if they can drive throughor in our Court if cars are parked in from of the homes
   Rubbish collection day we are advised to put our Bins on No 4 Nature strip very tight now and hasanother 4 bins impossible .
   I know we have a shortage in housing but putting house up on land that can provide a happy medium for people not squashed in like sardines.in a can
   No 4 has a back yard were the family children can play safely not out on the streets. Our world is and has changed so much. Please let our court be a safe quiet haven for people to live in..Which it is now.
   I there for say NO to planning permit PA24-0115
   Yours Margaret Patterson

2. I am Neil Patterson of 7 Delta CRT Cranbourne Vic
   I reside with my mother Margaret Patterson.She has lodge her objections
   My objections to planning permit P A 24 -0115.
   The entrance to no 4 does not allow the space for 2 driveways.
   The park in CRT infrastructure of No 4 has a Fire Hydrant CFA rules laws no parking with in metre either side of Hydrant. Wednesday night we are advise by council to put our bins on no 4 Delta crt nature more bins Mayham.
   Parking instreet by residents visitor's tradies make it hard for our essential services to enter with their vehicles.
   Soccer club in OToole Rd have event's and the see fit to park in the surrounding streets.
   We have had the Police attend to see the parking problem plus they booked cars parking in wrong areas .Residents and car drives were not happy.Make it safe for families to play in back yard instead of on the street's
   These are my objections to N o 4 Delta CRT Cranbourne Vic
   Neil Patterson 0401 214 883

3. WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR MY OBJECTIONS:
   *The court we live in is very small, only 8 homes in total. We feel that this court is far too small to accommodate another residential dwelling. Especially the issues of parking spaces in the court, at times, can already be limited when residents need to move cars around or are expecting visitors.
   *Then the issue of vehicles which could be in the way to inhibit any emergency vehicles from entering the court, if need be, in an emergency.
   *And the court will be totally blocked during the time of the actual building, due to the various trucks for deliveries of building products and tradesmen’s vans and utilities, plus all the extra noise. This could easily be more than 6-8 months.
   *Also, the property, itself, has a reasonably narrow driveway, which I would think would be hard for two separate dwellings to share on one property. This could also be a safety issue, especially if any small children resided there.
   *As set by strict rules from the Council, we put all the bins out on the nature strip of no. 4. It may seem like a small thing but there wouldn’t be enough space to put out more bins, as there is also a fire hydrant on that nature strip.

   My husband and have lived at 3 Delta Court, Cranbourne, for 38 years. And I personally have lived in this estate longer, as l previously lived in Delray Court for the previous 10 yrs. We bought and stayed in this estate, as it was a very safe and serine place to live, especially with limiting the amount of dwelling which could be built here, due to the whole estate being made up of just courts and no through road. We feel that if this sort of permit is passed through this time, it would open the door for many more to do the same.
   But now with the prospect of having another residential dwelling being built in this very small court, it is going to change the environment and safe lifestyle for all the residents in the court, many of whom are being of an older age, including myself now 70 years old.
   There will be far more traffic coming in and out of our small court. Please reconsider your decision and deny this application as such. It would be so much better for the new occupant to have an extension on the current dwelling, as mentioned on the application, as it is quite small. And they could also enjoy the space in their back yard, especially if they are a family with small children.
   Also we were surprised to not receive any notification of the proposal and intention of a new dwelling and there was no advertisement of any sort displayed on the property with details. I found this very surprising?
   Regards, Anna Hawking 0419 521 662
   – So these are my Objections to Planning Permit Application Number PA 24-0115

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Casey City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment