34 George Street Reservoir VIC 3073

Description

Application to build twenty-three (23) three (3) storey dwellings with associated car parking; to convert an existing heritage-listed church into a dwelling; and to reduce the number of car parking spaces required as shown on the plans accompanying the application.

Planning Authority

Darebin City Council

View source

Reference number

D/648/2023

Date sourced

We found this application on the planning authority's website on 21 December 2023, almost 2 years ago. It was received by them 1 day earlier.

Notified

261 people were notified of this application via Planning Alerts email alerts

Comments

2 comments made here on Planning Alerts

Save this search as an email alert?

Create an account or sign in.

It only takes a moment.

Public comments on this application

Comments made here were sent to Darebin City Council. Add your own comment.

”

Hello I have no issue with this being redeveloped however 23 additional homes
Great News
however >>>with reduced parking as a request
Come on
What do we thing will happen >>> it will be chaos
We only get one chance to get this right lets not accept less parking when it should be more so 23 residences 23 places plus 5 visitors

It just common sense, forget the developer greed look long term please

Steven Beach

Almost 2 years ago

Delivered to Darebin City Council

Report this comment

”

We need more housing in Melbourne. I support this proposal.

As the previous commenter indicated, parking may be an issue. However, I ask the council to require a permit to park on the street (and not issue permits to new subdivisions) rather than increasing the number of off-street spaces required for the development. This way the amenity for existing residents is preserved, without requiring new residents to pay for additional off-street parking they may not want or need. If they do want this parking, of course the developer is able to respond to that and provide it.

Matt Cowgill

Almost 2 years ago

Delivered to Darebin City Council

Report this comment