The proposed setbacks, massing, finishings and design of the buildings will dominate the surrounds and will not positively respond to the surrounding context.
The proposed setbacks design and massing of the building will unreasonably impact upon the character of the area.
The proposal fails to respond to off site amenity of surrounding properties, resulting in unreasonable visual bulk and overshadowing impacts.
The use and buildings are of a scale and intensity which will result in unreasonable amenity impacts on the surrounds.
The scale, lack of setbacks and lack of landscaping all contribute to an overdevelopment of the site.
The proposal fails to provide adequate landscaping opportunities and ensure suitable maintenance of native vegetation.
The proposed use and development, having regard to the site and surrounding area, would represent an inappropriate planning outcome.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with best practice environmentally sustainable outcomes in context of energy use, internal amenity, solar access, water use and runoff of precipitation from the site.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with proper parking provision for residents and visitors to avoid unacceptable amenity impacts to its occupants and surrounding area land that may include future residential uses wholly or partly.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with contemporary best practice environmentally sustainable outcomes in context of energy use, rainwater capture in context of local annual precipitation, preventing entry of litter to stormwater drains through suitable pollutant traps and screens, light pollution and spill from the development, water use and runoff of precipitation from the site.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with the management of bin washing upon the site and the impacts of the discharge of associated waste into the stormwater network.
The proposal has not adequately dealt with the separation of pedestrian entry from motor vehicle entry routes.
Insufficient information has been provided to enable a comprehensive assessment of the proposals impact on internal amenity and neighbouring dwelling amenity through the creation of light, noise, odour, access of non-resident a, birds and vermin to waste stored in site areas and litter as well as contamination risks and impacts on existing and neighbouring vegetation.
Insufficient information has been provided regarding investigations of the site, soils and existing structures or remains to identify hazardous materials and provide Council information about plans for construction waste management, protection of the environment from dust and runoff, and responsible waste disposal including selecting suitable contractors and facilities for construction waste disposal.
Insufficient information has been provided on vegetation types for landscaping and the maintenance of suitable native vegetation of local provenance.
The proposal fails to respect the existing and preferred neighbourhood character of the area, fails to demonstrate integration with the surrounding urban environment, and fails to protect significant vegetation on the site.
The proposal fails to respond to and achieve local planning and environmental objectives as it does not seek to retain any existing canopy tree, and the building envelope location, scale and setbacks do not provide sufficient space in its surrounds to enable the planting of canopy trees, or provide adequate opportunities for meaningful landscaping or canopy tree planting between the front, side and rear of the building envelope and the boundaries.
The proposal fails to respond to off site amenity of surrounding properties that may include future residential use, and those with education use, resulting in unreasonable visual bulk and overshadowing impacts.
The use and buildings are of a scale and intensity which will result in unreasonable amenity impacts on the neighbouring properties.
The height and size of illuminated business signs will unreasonably impact upon the area character and the surrounding environment.
The site is within a short distance of the Western Sydney University space observatory and will generate excessive light pollution which when added to the surrounding environment will impact upon the Astronomical community experience of stargazing.
The scale, lack of setbacks and lack of landscaping all contribute to an overdevelopment of the site.
The proposal fails to provide adequate landscaping opportunities and ensure suitable maintenance of native vegetation.
The proposed use and development, having regard to the site and surrounding area, would represent an inappropriate planning outcome.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with best practice environmentally sustainable outcomes in context of energy use, internal amenity, solar access, water use and runoff of precipitation from the site.
The proposal represents an over intensification of the use type for the area, an area whose population within a 2km radius of the site being already adequately serviced by convenience restaurant uses of the type proposed.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with contemporary best practice environmentally sustainable outcomes in context of energy use, rainwater capture in context of local annual precipitation, preventing entry of litter to stormwater drains through suitable pollutant traps and screens, internal amenity, light pollution and spill from the development and protecting residents from off site sources of light spill, solar access, water use and runoff of precipitation from the site.
The proposal has not dealt adequately with the management of bin washing upon the site and the impacts of the discharge of associated waste into the stormwater network.
The proposal has not adequately dealt with the separation of pedestrian entry from motor vehicle entry routes.
Insufficient information has been provided to enable a comprehensive assessment of the proposals impact on internal amenity and neighbouring area amenity through the creation of light, noise, odour, access of non-resident a, birds and vermin to waste stored in site areas and litter as well as contamination risks and impacts on existing and neighbouring vegetation.
Insufficient information has been provided on vegetation types for landscaping and the maintenance of suitable native vegetation of local provenance.
The proposal fails to demonstrate integration with the surrounding urban environment, and fails to protect significant vegetation on the site.
The proposal fails to respond to and achieve local planning and environmental objectives as it does not seek to retain any existing canopy tree, and the building envelope location, scale and setbacks do not provide sufficient space in its surrounds to enable the planting of canopy trees, or provide adequate opportunities for meaningful landscaping or canopy tree planting between the front, side and rear of the building envelope and the boundaries.
The proposal will harm the health of the local community through introducing an excessively density for the population and area size of food outlets marketing energy dense nutrient poor foods by businesses that engage in marketing directly to children and adolescents.
It's submitted by this local resident that the only appropriate determination of this application is one of Refusal.
