5 Wewak Road Holsworthy NSW 2173

Description
The construction of a new two storey, brick veneer duplex and Torrens title subdivision.
Planning Authority
Liverpool City Council
View source
Reference number
DA-348/2021
Date sourced
We found this application on the planning authority's website on , over 4 years ago. It was received by them earlier.
Notified
123 people were notified of this application via Planning Alerts email alerts
Comments
8 comments made here on Planning Alerts

Save this search as an email alert?

Create an account or sign in.

It only takes a moment.

Public comments on this application

8

Comments made here were sent to Liverpool City Council. Add your own comment.

Wewak Road at Holsworthy is already over saturated with 8 duplex style properties in a street that originally had 14 standard dwellings. This development will bring potentially 8 additional residents living in a small street and 4+ additional vehicles entering and exiting the street each day, all likely to be parked on the street as is the case with the six existing duplex properties in the street located at 1, 10, 12 Wewak Road. These properties already have multiple vehicles parked on the street rather than on their property regardless of the car accommodation they have. This results in access/vehicle flow issues to the street when combined with the traffic island at the entry point on Bardia Parade. In addition, Wewak Road is already a thoroughfare for the adjoining Derna Road to access Bardia Parade.

Council allows these developments bringing more people to the area however there has been no extra facilities built in the community to accommodate the future population growth. It is a topical issue that car parking at the local train station is already at capacity (pre COVID) and the local roads are choked particularly at during morning and afternoon peak periods.

I'm also concerned about privacy. The property to side of my home appears to have windows with views to my back yard.

These type of developments have been approved without considering the street size, resident opinion, neighbouring residents privacy, local facilities and infrastructure and the potential loss of property value particularly for our family as we already have a duplex property to the back of property, next door, across the road and potentially another one next door.

I object to this development for reasons given above.

Lisa Campbell
Delivered to Liverpool City Council

I totally agree with what Lisa Campbell is saying. That's all that seems to be developed these days....more rates! Objection was clearly made to 8 town houses on two adjoining blocks on Bardia Pde. And lack of privacy isn't a concern to council.
Some streets in holsworth/wattlegrove cannot cater for high volume of cars.
This area is going down the toilet.

eileen
Delivered to Liverpool City Council

Hi. I wanted to address a couple concerns with this particular development.

The first floor windows on the western side comprise a skyline window in the front bedroom which will not be usable and will not be seen out of. The middle first floor window is in a spare sitting room which will have minimal use and only be able to be seen out of when standing, also which should not overlook the next door backyard from that point of the house, and the side/rear window is a spare / children's bedroom which will have minimal use and only be seen out of when standing.

Similarly on the eastern side there is only 1 usable window at the side/rear which is a smaller spare / children's bedroom. The front window is a frosted bathroom window not near facilities and the middle window is above the stairs which is not usable.

Hopefully this alleviates the privacy concerns. There's effectively 3 usable side windows on the first floor of the entire development (east and west) which will have minimal use which is less than what a normal 2 story construction may have. All windows will have blinds affixed.

The other issue to address is the car parking and traffic. Currently there are 2 cars on the western house and 2 occupants planned and no additional people expected and they both work from home most days of the week limiting morning and evening peak traffic. They will definitely make use of both the garage and driveway. The other side will be similar (small family with max 2 cars expected to make use of both garage and driveway which is expected to be a requirement of the occupants). There should be minimal impact to street traffic from what is there currently.

Assuming the current existing house caters for 4 people, the additional occupants above this expected at the moment for the whole development will be between 2 - 3 maximum incl children with the owners expected to be living here for the foreseeable future of which there are only 2.

This development should be a significant improvement to the streetscape from the current angled yellow fibro house situated on the land.

Happy to discuss any concerns.

Cheers, Ryan.

Ryan Mormul
Delivered to Liverpool City Council

This comment was hidden by site administrators

WG citizen

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Et
Sent to Liverpool City Council

Further to my earlier comments, the main point I'm trying to raise here is that the long suffering, long term owner occupiers of Wewak Road don't want anymore multi dwellings in our little street. The applicant of this development proposal has opted out of formally notifying the impacted residents (by mail) as part of their application which is why I'm using this forum to voice my opinion. Compact living is not why we chose to live in Holsworthy. Privacy is something I value which is why I dislike construction of multi dwelling properties like this built 900mm off boundry fence lines. This development will see my home surrounded on all boundaries by duplexes lessing the appeal and value of my own home.

Lisa Campbell
Delivered to Liverpool City Council

Hi Lisa

I believe you need to make this objection directly to the council. I don’t believe any comments here are taken into consideration for the development process.

James
Delivered to Liverpool City Council

Hi WG Citizen.

I am actually a local resident too and have been for quite a number of years and also want the best for the area. I also want a nice quiet place to live. It's an area we want to stay in for the forseeable future so I don't want it to, and I don't think it will turn in to a slum as you mentioned. That seems a bit extreme. People need somewhere affordable to live and this duplex should make the most of the land whilst limiting the impact on neighbours. I can only speak for our example here and I hope others have the same considerations especially if they're local residents. The setbacks are a fair way from the boundaries and quite a bit more than the minimums, especially on the western side, and isn't really any different to what a normal 2 story house may be overall. This, combined with the comments about the windows and other items I mentioned, should help. The current house isn't very good and was going to get replaced sooner or later. I'm not sure where your second last comment came from. It will actually cost quite a bit to get this through the council process and it's not as straightforward as it seems. There's a fair amount of restrictions and items to adhere to.... Council don't simply let these fly through... Sydney in general has been getting more populated and expensive for a long time which I assume is part of the reason why this zoning is in place. Gov't want people to sensibly develop appropriate usable land for this reason. There is no incentive from Gov't or council, it actually costs quite a bit to do. You're looking at close to $100K in fees and taxes before you look at the real land or building costs.... Neither the land or the build is "cheap" so it's not a get rich quick scheme. Newer freestanding houses are really expensive and we wanted to stay in the area. If anything, hopefully this improves the streetscape as the current house really isn't very good compared to what's around it, both older and newer. Also, please don't make personal comments like that last line. I don't think they're helpful for anyone and you don't know us or our circumstances. We're just a young couple that want to live in an area we like at an affordable cost, close to our family. Basically the same dream that most young people have. If we weren't local residents, or didn't care about the neighbours or the area I wouldn't have written anything here or considered some of the issues we have in the application.

@Lisa Campbell, apologies, the builders are lodging all of the DA requirements and I was not aware of anything specific to formally notify residents before this stage. I understood that happens as part of the DA process through council. They haven't mentioned anything else to us as yet about sending anything out. We have not intentionally decided to not notify people, as mentioned above we were told that's what the council process is for. The demolition notification on the other hand did go to all residents. My details are on that if you would like to discuss anything or the neighbour on the other side has my details (I haven't mentioned her name intentionally). Just on the point about boundaries on your side, the house starts about 1.2 metres off at the front and gradually moves away. The rear of the house is about 6 metres off the boundary so hopefully this lessens some of the privacy concerns, along with the comments about the windows and other items, and concerns about how close the houses are together. As a local resident I really do care about the area. If it was going to happen eventually I'd much rather a local resident that will live there do this than some random developer as we will actually care about the place and look after it and not simply treat it as an asset.

Happy if you want to chat about any concerns. I don't think this forum is the place so will leave it here....

Ryan
Delivered to Liverpool City Council

Add your own comment