We are the owners of 34 Lamorna St and are strongly against this proposed child care centre on the following grounds.
DEVALUATION: This would box our residence in the middle of 2 large car parks & potentially 100 noisy kids next door. The neighbouring properties will also be devalued considerably.
PRIVACY: This centre being such a large & high set facility would destroy any vestige of privacy with staff,children and potentially their parents being able to peer into our property and our house which is adjacent to the north boundary as well as some of the surrounding properties.
NOISE: A 6.00 am start time will mean we will be disturbed prior to then as staff arrive for work. This is unjustified in a residential area. Even builders aren't allowed to start before 6.30 am. The continual noise from this centre would be very hard to bear all day. Even the school is reasonably quiet between 9 - 3.30. No amount of sound barriers will diminish this continual impact. The proposed and necessary sound barriers would decimate our visual aspect and adversely affect the light and breeze to our home.
PARKING: This proposal includes off street parking - right across the fence from our bedrooms and that of our two children disturbing us early morning. A large number of vehicle movements will increase the risk to children walking/cycling to our adjacent school, not to mention people exercising. Trying to exit a large car park in peak times will create an extra safety risk to pedestrians with more cars on the street as well.
Construction: Such a centre will require demolition of the existing house and land.. Retainer walls built,earthworks and then construction subjecting us to the constant dust
(affecting my asthma) vibrations and noise for months
DESIGN: Just because this centre is constructed of similar materials to those in the street does not make it anything other than a complete eyesore. By Council specs it is too large for the block and the barriers at the fence too high. The required retainer wall of up to 1.3m and sound barrier of 2.6m will have us staring at something akin to the Berlin wall. The 1st floor sound barriers will make it look like some giant bunker and is not conducive to the streetscape. From the proposed plans the storage area will be adjacent to our bedroom window leaving us to smell dirty nappies and food waste.
TRAFFIC: Our street is busy enough with school traffic and those who use the street to travel to the shops on Underwood Rd. This centre will only add to this significantly across a broad time spectrum as well potentially creating a danger with cars coming and going 10m approximately from a school crossing.
VEGETATION: Along the northern boundary on this proposed site is a large gum tree which is frequently visited by Koalas especially in breeding season. We have photographic proof of this. It would appear that this tree would have to be removed for the retainer wall thus upsetting the migrating and eating habits of the local koala
population.
SEWER: Council rules stipulate that nothing can be built over a sewer line. Surely a business should not be allowed to skirt these rules by diverting the pipe. This pipe has just been refurbished with a sleeve by council so interfering with it may undo that work. Will the system handle the considerable extra usage? Will rerouting the pipe cause issues requiring the depth of the pipe to be changed? Our property was damaged during sewer works so we do not want further issues.
STORM WATER: This proposal will increase the amount of rainfall not absorbed by the ground and will concentrate most of the down hill flow onto our property. The proposed drainage system has tremendous capacity and will cause flooding and erosion of our house, shed and the adjoining school yard. The use of level spreaders will not mitigate this but in fact concentrate the flows.
ZONING: Having potentially 14 staff , 100 children and parents on a narrow suburban block is not small scale or in keeping with a low density zone. With a number of elderly people in the street it is out of character with the street and will destroy our amenity.
NEED: There was no evidence of a need for this centre and we would point out there are 6 such centres within 1.7 km's of this site, including the new centre just approved for Centre Place. We have seen no large influx of children commensurate with a need for another centre. Recent media reports about such centres would put a question mark over financial viability or need - certainly in a suburban street.
Conclusion: This centre would be out of character and an eyesore to the street and would destroy the amenity and lifestyle the residents enjoy. Our impending retirement, day to day living for us and those close will be irreversibly affected . We ask Council to look after its rate payers and stop this centre from proceeding.
This comment has been sent but has not yet been acknowledged by the email server of Logan City Council. This can happen if our email system or Logan City Council's email system or network has a temporary problem.
Please check back in an hour or so. If the status hasn't changed you can contact us to figure out what's going on.