PlanningAlerts

1 Comment

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. Dear Sir/Madam,

   I object to the planning application because the property is under heritage overlay HO24. What is the purpose of having an overlay and going through the process of classifying a building as heritage if it is to be overridden?

   As a result of Kerami’s ties to the early establishment of the area the property has historic and cultural significance. Its interesting architectural features also give it aesthetic significance. The demolition of this property would therefore detrimentally impact the municipality’s neighbourhood character, local history and liveability particularly in the face of surrounding subdivision and 'development'. Most importantly it provides a sense of identity and continuity in a fast changing world for current and future generations.

   Walking along Bamfield street never fails to give me pleasure because of the character of the buildings and the interest and beauty of Kerami. I am proud to show off the street particularly Kerami to visitors. As the area has few buildings of such historical significance and interest, it would be madness to demolish Kerami.
   
   Additionally, conservation of Kerami contributes to environmental and economic sustainability. A sensitive renovation of this house markedly reduces the waste, embodied energy and associated greenhouse gases which result from a demolition and a new build.

   Thank you for considering my objection.

   Yours faithfully,
   Jill Callaghan.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Bayside City Council (Victoria). They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment