PlanningAlerts

7 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. As a long standing owner of a property in Tahnee Lodge Estate, I have concerns this application will have a negative impact on our property’s value

2. I'm very concerned that the developer will be using the existing streets in Tarnee Lodge estate to carry out the construction of the new development. This will significantly impact the residents and will be dangerous for children playing in the park in Manor Drive. The Developer should be providing access to the subdivision from Scott's Lane and not through Tahnee Lodge estate.

3. As a resident living on manor drive with young children, this street is busy enough as it is without taking on further traffic with a new development.
   Entering and exiting from the new development should take place onsite of the development and not use adjoining roads at the risk and detriment of Tahnee estate residents

4. I live in Colbert Court, 3 houses away from the property/land, and believe a pedestrian access point is planned at the end of our court. I do not feel this is necessary, as the court is for residents. Given the green wedge status of the land surrounding Tahnee Lodge estate, part of what gives our estate its unique amenity is the rural feel and appearance of the streets and environment. It is what attracted me to the area. Developing 84 blocks as proposed will have a dire impact on the considerable diversity of birds and wildlife that we enjoy here. It will also negatively impact the creek that runs along the back of Colbert Court and the billabong and Ibis/waterbird rookery that is at 58 Stott's Lane (Dalmont Park). The runoff from 84 residential lots has the potential to contaminate the billabong and creek. There needs to be an environmental impact report conducted before such a proposal is even considered. I also agree with previous comments, that property values will be adversely affected.

5. Sorry, I meant 48 lots, not 84.

6. Tahnee Lodge estate is already listed as a code red high risk area for toxic emissions from the freeway (refer to environmental impact statement - Peninsula Link). This situation can only be exacerbated by a development of this proportion adjacent to this area.

7. This property has a large number of trees on it that would have to be cut down if houses were to be built on it. I trust Frankston Council will show a higher regard for the bird life in this area than for the potential profit to a developer.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Frankston City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment