PlanningAlerts

4 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I don’t feel that this application for TWO LOW COST RENTAL DWELLINGS should be allowed. It brings down the value of the houses surrounding and for all housing in NARELLAN and NARELLAN Vale! If this is allowed then ALL EXISTING HOMES should be allowed to do the same. I see a DOUBLE STANDARDS in the CSMDEN COUNCIL where one is allowed and another application is not allowed. Please advise me if this goes ahead as l will be very vocal if it does. I DO NOT WANT THIS APPLICATION TO GO AHEAD AS STATED AT BEGINNING of THIS EMAIL! Thank you
   Cheryl Minihan

2. I believe the owners should have the right to be allowed to demolish and build two houses on their land (depending on sizes of dwellings), but I do object to the fact that Council went out of its way to change the criteria for land owners who would have been able to do the same thing on lots the same size, and bigger, by restricting dual occupancy on lots under a 18 meter frontage, which I see as very unfair on us who have property in medium density R3 zoning. Luckily for these applicants, they have a larger frontage even though I question if they are in medium density zoned area. I agree with Cheryl Minihan, in that it is unfair, and a double standard, but I believe the owners have the right to do this.
   Alana Jeanes

3. I agree with Alana (going back a bit on my earlier message) that they should be able to put on two homes on their property depending on the size of the dwellings. I agree also that council went out of there way to change the criteria who have been able to do the same thing on lots the same size by restricting dual occupancy on lots just under 18 mtre frontage. Yes they have the “right to do this” however what about the rest of the other land/house owners in the narellan/narellan vale area which Council has refused as for instance a frontage of 17.5 mtre and not allowing same development as we are talking about here. We pay same rates but given no say at all. Yes they asked for submissions but did they reply as to the outcome? No! Just left it hanging and when you want to get information about the outcome you get the “run around”. We have been rate payers here for over 35 years! That should mean at least being listened to! Thank you Alana Jones for your comments. At least l am not alone in all this unfairness! Is there anyone else out there with similar comments! Once again Thank you
   Cheryl Minihan

4. Well Cheryl, I appreciate that at least one other person understands the unfairness of the frontage changes made by council. I did object in writing and at the Council meeting and I believe given answers that were not answers. Will be interesting to see what they really have planned for land owners/rate payers in the future.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Camden Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment