Report comment

In Petersham NSW on “Alteration and additions to...” at 40 Bishop Street Petersham NSW 2049:

June Aaron commented

I strongly oppose this application for the following reasons:
1. Traffic density is already too high in Bishop St and there is minimal parking available for the current number of residents.
2. Bishop St and Jarvie Ave are quiet residential streets. A commercially operated Boarding House does not fit the current community profile.
3. There are already too many Boarding Houses in Petersham. As a suburb, we are currently more than covering our responsibility to provide affordable housing.
4. The privacy of residents in Bishop St, Morgan St and Jarvie Ave who share a boundary with this property would be compromised by this development going ahead.

delivered to the planning authority

This form is for reporting comments that should be removed. Reasons can include that the comment is spam, abusive, unlawful or harassing — in other words, where people are going out of their way to cause harm. Please explain clearly why you think the comment should be removed.

This week

Find PlanningAlerts useful?

This independent project is run by a local charity, the OpenAustralia Foundation. PlanningAlerts is powered by small, tax-deductible donations from the people who use it to stay informed about changes to their local area. If you find it useful, chip in to support PlanningAlerts.

Back PlanningAlerts