PlanningAlerts

4 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. This development will affect our street character and will increase flood in our homes .
   Will put more pressure on parking,local infrastructure and green areas in our street

2. Yes, Andrew - this is insane!
   While Mr Guy imposed new planning possibilities, it was done without proper due diligence.
   It is an utter disgrace.

3. The comments above would be considered as 'appropriate' and 'unbiased' had they not been made by people who have built in excess of 70% of their property. The first person above has built a 'granny flat' in addition to another dwelling, after cutting down all the trees in the back yard. This has resulted in rainwater flowing out of his property directly into the street, causing additional risks to flooding. Isn't this hypocritical when it comes to preserving 'green areas' and the affects of 'potential flooding'!!

   As for the second comment, isn't the council and town planning authorities responsible for ensuring the proper due diligence is followed? What is your expectation for 'due diligence' - the only 'disgrace' are the accusations and comments you make.

   'Character' of the street has changed over the decades - and it will continue to change over time. Why were 2-storey homes built in the street - made of 'bricks' and not weatherboards when originally, all the homes were made of weatherboard? What gave people the right to build and for you to occupy a 2-storey home and overlook a single home and the privacy of their backyard? PROGRESS!!

   People. Don't be hypocrites - especially if you one of those that lives in a massive double storey home overlooking your neighbour's back yard and invading their privacy. Don't criticise if you've built on most of your property and the rainwater is flowing into the gutters - and you are a major contributor to the storm water filling up.

4. The comments above would be considered as 'appropriate' and 'unbiased' had they not been made by people who have built in excess of 70% of their property. The first person above has built a 'granny flat' in addition to another dwelling, after cutting down all the trees in the back yard. This has resulted in rainwater flowing out of his property directly into the street, causing additional risks to flooding. Isn't this hypocritical when it comes to preserving 'green areas' and the affects of 'potential flooding'!!

   As for the second comment, isn't the council and town planning authorities responsible for ensuring the proper due diligence is followed? What is your expectation for 'due diligence' - the only 'disgrace' are the accusations and comments you make.

   'Character' of the street has changed over the decades - and it will continue to change over time. Why were 2-storey homes built in the street - made of 'bricks' and not weatherboards when originally, all the homes were made of weatherboard? What gave people the right to build and for you to occupy a 2-storey home and overlook a single home and the privacy of their backyard? PROGRESS!!

   People. Don't be hypocrites - especially if you one of those that lives in a massive double storey home overlooking your neighbour's back yard and invading their privacy. Don't criticise if you've built on most of your property and the rainwater is flowing into the gutters - and you are a major contributor to the storm water filling up.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to City of Glen Eira. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment