PlanningAlerts

9 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. This application should be rejected as it will cause major traffic disruptions to an already crowded area as well as overshadowing.

2. The 16 story building is out of character for the street and will create too much shading for residents. The congestion created with car parking for only 446 vehicles will only turn this suburb into a gridlock. Why not create SOME public parking for visitors to Wentworth Point. A parking station would not be out of the question!

3. A 16 storey building is out of character with the surrounding buildings. I'd prefer it to less obstructive to the surrounding properties.

4. The masterplan for the suburb restricts building heights to 8 levels on the southern end of the peninsula. If the plan persists the 16 level portion should be on the other side of the site to reduce the overshadowing and keep it to the proposee site. The number of proposed parking spots is grossly restrictive for a building of that size with only 1.1 spots per unit.

5. I'm gonna pretend that our comments do work in some way on this. Plus lot 8's 4-5 high rise buildings and the already approved ones, just exactly how many high rises does the govertment actually plan for this peninsula?

6. We in Wentworth point already have to put up with limited parking spaces for ourselves let alone our guests and visitors. Adding high rises certainly doesn't help the situation. What's your plan for existing residents council?

7. This application should be rejected as there isn't the infrastructure to support more residential housing. The was a future planned for the area and to have a maximum population and Corrupt council has since allowed developers pretty much do what they like ahead of the people and made the population projection five-fold. There is insufficient public transport, insufficient facilities including public areas, parking and parkland. In the time I have been living here I have seen nothing positive from Council.

8. Unless they can provide 804 parking spaces, this proposal shall be rejected. We have serious problem with the amount of parking space across the suburb.

   This is a bad planning and poor malpractice of city council to even let such planning released let alone approving it.

9. Unless they can provide 804 parking spaces, this proposal shall be rejected. We have serious problem with the amount of parking space across the suburb.

   This is a bad planning and poor malpractice of city council to even let such planning released let alone approving it.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Auburn City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment