PlanningAlerts

3 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I'm strongly against this development.

   1. Existing house is a landmark that adds charm and homey feeling to the area. Replacing it with budget building will ruin that feeling.

   2. Building a boarding house in this area will increase environmental and social stress to the neighbourhood, which has already high exposure to noise and pollution from traffic. As the result, it will decrease value of homes in the neighbourhood, including my house.

2. I am also opposed to the proposed boarding house which is being considered amongst a tightly held family residential zone.
   I have submitted my objection via a letter to council and to the state and federal members of Cook.
   Such a project does not belong here. The social instability it will bring to the area threatens the current environment.
   The proposal allows for limited car spaces which will impact traffic and parking along the Kingsway.
   I note a boarding house at 83 the Kingsway but this is set amongst units and a hotel closer to the beach and does not look aesthetically or socially out of place.
   All local residents should forward their opposition to council and ministers so our current stable residential environment is maintained. Boarding houses may be a quick way to make some good money for developers but the negative social and environmental impact to the local community cannot be ignored.
   Kay Koutzas

3. There is no demand for boarding accommodation in this area....I strongly this boarding house will used to accommodate refugees or to ex jail criminals or recovering addicts.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Sutherland Shire Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment