PlanningAlerts

5 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. Dear Sir/ Madam,

   Subject : objection to proposed caravan/relocatable home park MCUI/31/2015.

   We are objecting to the above proposal as we feel the impact to the wildlife and our country living would be heavily affected with the increase traffic and make Flesser Rd very dangerous for the people that already use it. We feel it will also decrease the value of our property and increase the crime rate in the area.

   Please keep us updated with the out come of this proposal and feel free to contact us regarding our objection.

   Thank you
   Andrew & Julie Bobermien
   80 Archer Crt
   Chambers Flat

2. We also object to the proposed caravan park / relocatable home park (MCUI-31/2015)

   Flesser Road is not in a fit state to cater for the heavy vehicles, nor the volume of traffic expected when construction commences. As it is now, the road is narrow and precarious edges makes passing oncoming traffic a nightmare. The continuous physical force exerted by heavy vehicles will make it even more dangerous.

   Public transport isn't available in the area. Should the park go ahead, what plans does council have in place for the impact of an extra 350 people living in the vicinity of Koplick and Flesser Roads?

   High density housing does not fit in the rural location of Flesser Road and its surrounds.

3. I object to the proposed caravan/relocate lee home project MCUI-31/2015. I am concerned with traffic volumes in flesser rd. there are already numerous of these types of properties in the area so do not agree that we need another such property. This area has a rural feel and most of the appeal of this area is the quiet streets and roads. This type of proposed development would require extensive changes to our current services to this area that I do not feel are needed.

4. Yes also my husband and I do object to this application for caravan/ relocatable home park. The area has more than enough cars and trucks travelling along Flesser and Koplick every morning and afternoon without adding more congestion. This is a rural area with lots of wildlife and with more development and housing and lost bushland this will impact on the wildlife residing in the area not to mention the probability of more crime in the area and the lack of quality roads. We feel this will impact on ours and others lifestyle in the immediate area. We all bought out here to get away from all of that and now you are bringing it right on our doorstep. We already have 3 lifestyle resorts in close proximity, Greenbank Gardens, Hammond Village and Chambers Pines only 3 k away. We do not need another in this area. Please take our concerns into account as we have lived here for 18 years and do not want to see it ruined.

5. I too object to the prosed development on Flesser rd. I feel these types of properties would be best suited in suburban built up areas with shops or public transport nearby. This area is wildlife rich and public facilities poor. Such a large increase in people to this area will harm our quiet rural lifestyle and do serious harm to the wildlife habitat. This type of development is simply high density low cost cheap housing and not something our area needs.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Logan City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment