PlanningAlerts

2 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I advise that lot 525 is in Rokeby, not Howrah.
   According to the relocation of the boundary approved by the Nomenclature Board and noted in the Tasmanian Gazette, Lot 525 is in Rokeby, not Howrah. Council records show this to be so.
   I strongly suggest that if development were to proceed in Lot 525, it should be listed and marketed as being in Rokeby.
   The applicant must make this alteration to the application.
   Thanks,
   Dennis Matthews

2. I advise that lot 525 is in Rokeby, not Howrah.
   According to the relocation of the boundary approved by the Nomenclature Board and noted in the Tasmanian Gazette, Lot 525 is in Rokeby, not Howrah. Council records show this to be so.
   I strongly suggest that if development were to proceed in Lot 525, it should be listed and marketed as being in Rokeby.
   The applicant must make this alteration to the application.
   Thanks,
   Dennis Matthews

Have your say on this application

You're too late! The period for officially commenting on this application finished over 1 year ago. If you chose to comment now, your comment will still be displayed here and be sent to the planning authority but it will not be officially considered by the planning authority.

Your comment and details will be sent to Clarence City Council. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment