PlanningAlerts

4 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. Absolutely not! There are significant trees on this site. Access has always been dangerous even when a single dwelling.

2. There are a number of substantial trees on this property that should not be removed.
   Three townhouses on a 747 square block is an overuse of the land. There is also an issue around the driveways for these units. There are already a number of units on the opposite side of the road which would be extremely hazardous. Anfield court cannot sustain any more driveways either. There seems to be very little consideration for parking
   $750,000 does not seem a reasonable figure for this size of development. I feel they will look cheap and devalue the area

3. Under no circumstances should Council approve yet another construction of three Townhouses, these are my reasons.
   There are several significant trees that must be protected from the overuse of land considering its size and this proposal. Additionally, there would be concerns for the neighbourhood character adding to the already damaging construction of the same directly opposite through its visual bulk, concrete jungle, and inferior appearance! I would hardly expect that $750,000 would bring forth a quality build and just as the property opposite has, will further cheapen the area devaluing the surrounding properties. I also have concerns over how this development will affect drainage in the area, both Anfield Court and Rotherwood Drive have seen its fair share of issues with Council drains over the years!
   This will also generate more traffic, and therefore a potential hazard having these two properties opposite, that is a most likely 12 vehicles coming and going at all hours between them which will also generate more noise disturbance and during the night-time will also cause a disturbance through headlights shining into homes and will feel more like a major road we are living in, than that of a supposed quiet residential street, additionally it will be a nightmare on bin collection days! I also have concerns over parking, which is already limited, and just to accommodate three townhouses, this will result in further parking being reduced for the allocation of vehicle crossovers.

4. There are a number of substantial trees on this property that should not be removed.
   Three townhouses on a 747 square block is an overuse of the land. There is also an issue around the driveways for these units. There are already a number of units on the opposite side of the road which would be extremely hazardous. Anfield court cannot sustain any more driveways either. There seems to be very little consideration for parking
   $750,000 does not seem a reasonable figure for this size of development. I feel they will look cheap and devalue the area

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to City of Stonnington. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment