PlanningAlerts

9 Comments

Have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I believe this dwelling to be under a heritage listing and is one of the oldest buildings in Norwood. It should be retained.
   The current owner purchased the dwelling knowing that it could not be demolished.

2. I am opposed to any heritage listed property being demolished.

3. If this property is under a heritage listing, then it should not be demolished. We need to protect our heritage listed buildings and dwellings.

4. If this building is in fact under heritage protection, it should not be demolished.
   This is especially so if the purchaser bought it under protection or pending protection.

5. This property was clearly bought under the knowledge that it was heritage listed. Therefore it must not to be demolished but restored.

6. If the building is heritage listed it needs to be restored, not demolished.

7. There are 2 buildings on this site. 1 is heratige listed and the other is not. I believe the application for demolition is for the non heritage listed building.

8. Our fast disappearing heritage needs protection. The brick cottage fronting Elizabeth St is one of the oldest houses in Norwood and therefore a precious link to our past. Any proposed alterations to this building need to be carefully scrutinised and sympathetic.

9. It’s a huge shame 74 (which is looks to be pretty solid and in good condition) has to go but No 34 Elizabeth Street (on the same block as 74) should be saved at all cost as it must be one of the oldest houses in Norwood.