PlanningAlerts

11 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. Defiantly NO to demolishion, Large heritage home with plenty of Character, this needs to stop in our historical town, it is different to demolish a modern 70's building, but to destroy part of the history of Sandgate and Shorncliffe 4017 is unexceptable. Again, why would you destroy such a beautiful home that has propabely been here for over 100 years. History of house should be done before any discission is made, proper renovation is all this homne needs.. not demolishion or subdivission.

2. Why demolish a heritage building when there’s a large block right next door earmarked for development. Please don’t whittle away Sandgates character.

3. This house looks too historical to be demolished for no good reason other than development. Sandgate's character MUST NOT be allowed to be destroyed by developers. We can never get these beautiful houses back once they are gone.

4. Disgraceful... please dont demolish a heritage house. It has been in the area for over 100 years. It would demoralize the street scape.

5. Why would approve the demolition of a house that is part of the character of Sandgate? Let’s see some sensible decisions about preserving Sandgate’s character. If we don’t start really looking at the impact demolishing character homes and putting multiple buildings in their place as a matter of urgency, Sandgate will lose its appeal. Not to mention impacts of infrastructure and the community as a whole.

   Please consult widely with the community before approving such applications.

   A very concerned resident.

6. I would actually just like to reiterate the comment above by Deborah Price. I couldn't say it better. I am deeply concerned about over development and innappropriate development in this historic area.
   Who would approve the demolition of a house that is part of the character of Sandgate? Let’s see some sensible decisions about preserving Sandgate’s character. If we don’t start really looking at the impact demolishing character homes and putting multiple buildings in their place as a matter of urgency, Sandgate will lose its appeal. Not to mention impacts of infrastructure and the community as a whole.
   Please consult widely with the community before approving such applications.

7. I strongly object to the demolition of any old and historic house in Sandgate and the surrounding area. Sandgate is an opportunity to preserve the history of Brisbane and Queensland architecture. Too often the character of a suburb is destroyed with over or inappropriate development. Only after the fact does the community realise what has been lost. Don’t let this happen in Sandgate.

8. That is a big “NO” on demolition of any historical properties in Sandgate and Shorncliffe. These houses are the heart of Sandgate and many people come here from other states just to see these legendary Queensland homes as they are now well known for their legacy to Queensland.

9. That's a great development, it is good to see that they to keep the front houses in line with the character of the area.

   Good stuff should be more of it.

10. As a resident in the street I fully support this application. The property owner should be able to make best and highest use of the property provided they comply with the zoning, local district plan and other code/overlays required by council. The plans look to be in keeping with the "tin and timber" flavour of Sandgate village. There have been in the past, several inappropriate developments in prominent locations that have destroyed the Sandgate streetscape, with their bulk, choice of materials and architecture. Although the property is in central Sandgate, it's visibility is diminished by the Railway Station. The existing building is probably past it's use by date. While it has some architectural merits, it is not outstanding and the new building is retaining most of the buildings features. Built in to the new building will be materials that provide the amenity expected for modern day living. Throwing a blanket ban on the demolition of houses built before some arbitrary date is not a progressive strategy. Imagine if we applied a similar rule to motor vehicles.
    I am more fearful of what may occur on the old gas works site and the impact any development there will have on the amenity of Towner Street. While we have a Council that thinks extensive and wide spread consultation with residents and ratepayers regarding a new District Neighbourhood Plan is achieved by placing a few triangulated signs on some obscure poles, I am sure we will be kept well and truly in the dark.

11. My main focus of concern lies with the impact this development will have on Cabbage Tree Creek's eco system.
    This area is also tidal and floods, so I'm assuming would need to be built up inline with Q100, therefor run off from (washing vehicles etc) would end up in the natural waterway.
    Luckily I dont live in this street anymore, because the additional traffic would also take away the charm of the street.
    This could be a valid build if the two existing houses were part of the proposed multiple dwellings, instead of building in 'the back yard' to the detriment of Cabbage Tree Creek.
    Would love to read the environmental impact report on this. Something doesn't add up here, in my opinion.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Brisbane City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment