PlanningAlerts

2 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I am an owner of a two bedroom mobile home. (11yrs in June 20) My home is one of the 20 annual sites slated for "redevelopement" During this period I have spent many thousands improving my "bonneydoon". I wish to strongly object to this proposal, including but not limited too # During the floods we could not enter or exit the park thru the combined in/ out driveway.(Shoalhaven Heads road is the only entrance/exit available to the entire park) Provision was made to exit on Jerry Bailey road. Corporate greed surfaced and a dwelling was constructed on the exit land at 15 Jerry Bailey rd. Drastically putting an end to the proposed exit option.??? #Vehicle parking is a big issue. 4 spots are available only out the front. At present the 20 annual sites are set 3+ meters from the existing roadway. Leaving enough room to park dirrectly in front of your van/cabin. With the "proposal" this will be impossible with only 1meter of land from the road.??? # The RFS could not access some streets because of the tightness of the placing of new mobile homes.??? # This holiday park will resemble a "Retirement Village" and it is not strictly over 55's. My "new" neighbours across the road (good people) are 3 yrs older than me. I am turning 51 this year.??? These are issues that have to be addressed! I know this is a struggle comparative to "David & Goliath" but please consider my argument. I have been a resident of Shoalhaven Heads since 1991. Yours sincerley James.

2. I object to this DA, for the following reasons. Rubbish collection, Rosella st is only 4m wide it is not wide enough for the truck to come in. The poor maintenance man empty the large bins by hand which is discusting it shows the level of concern for safety this company has especially during the covid-19 pandemic. Flooding, during the floods I sat in horror and watched the only staff member that was around ( the then manager, please note we have not had a manager for months) try and move all the boats and caravans from down the back due to the rapidly rising flood waters. He was not successful and some floated away. I also could not exit the caravan park as the only exit was also flooded, it was quite scary. Noise, as there are people who have brought these permanent homes who are under 50 years old with the homes being so high the noise travels and keeps me awake at night. Car parking, you are only allowed 1 vehicle per site and there are only 4 available car spots in the car park I was told to park on Shoalhaven heads rd. Sometimes it's full and I have to park on Jerry Bailey rd. Fire, when the fires hit the Shoalhaven I was fearful that if the adjacent bushland caught alight we would be in trouble especially as the fire trucks would have trouble accessing this street because of the width of the rd. The two permanent residents on the street are elderly and have lived here for years for them to lose there little homes would be very un Australian of council. So for these reasons and for the safety of new and current residents of the caravan park I strongly oppose this DA.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Shoalhaven City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment