PlanningAlerts

5 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. This house does not have enough area for people to move from front house to rear dwelling and pool. The side entrance is way too small!

2. But I believe they have an 18 meter frontage!!

3. They may have an 18 metre frontage. However where is the room to independently move from one house to the other without going through the existing building?

4. I was making a point that, thanks to Council's new regulations, it doesn't matter so long as the frontage is 18 meters or over, and lot size is over 600m2. I haven't seen any plans but assume this is for a family and the set out would not be an issue (to them).
   It warrants the question why when people have larger lot sizes they are not not allowed the same liberties. There is an agenda we are not privy to.

5. There seems to be an attitude of “us” and them” mentality! Council have DOUBLE STANDARDS!
   What is allowed to happen on one block should be able to be done on another block. There does need to be a standard size of a frontage allowing for room building/s. However there needs to be “exceptions” to this “policy” but Council are steadfast! If you have a lot of money to give to “council” for their “contribution fund” on top of the “normal payments”, then seems you can do as you like. As ratepayers there needs to be a “group of ratepayers” to protest outside council with “media attention@. I personally see that this is the only way that maybe able to change their “Double standards! What are your thoughts people?

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Camden Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment