PlanningAlerts

3 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. This property has been the subject of much anguish and comment since 2010 following some negligence in building leading to a forced demolition.
   The understanding was always that the historic facade would be rebuilt to match the original.
   Any application to use alternative materials in the facade should be rejected.
   The delay of 10 years for this rebuild remains a constant eyesore to our neighbourhood.

2. Totally agree with Ed Neff - this small stretch of road has lost a lot of character - the council really needs to do more to ensure some sympathetic developments are enforced - it would not cost any extra to replicate the original facade and would retain so much value in the street.

3. The application to vary the conditions of the permit should be dismissed. It has been very wearying for residents who have been seeking to protect and maintain the village amenities. The developers should be required to adhere to all conditions of the permit.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to City of Stonnington. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment