PlanningAlerts

2 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. I strongly object to this application for a number of reasons. I don’t understand why a very expensive house like this can be built and the best solution has to be to place air conditioning towers in the roof instead of beside the house as most neighbours have done.
   The air conditioning units are highly visible from all directions, they obstruct the views of the coastline from ours and other homes behind in Shackel Ave and are an eyesore from street level on Eastbourne Ave as well. The house exceeds height limits with these units and this is totally unacceptable when views are protected in this area.
   The units need to be relocated, they were not on the original plans and were placed without approval. The part of the roof where they located is architecturally interesting yet, they have chosen to spoil the roof line with these units. Poor decision.

2. I would like to put to your attention that the installation of the a/c unit on the roof of the 26 Eastbourne Avenue Clovelly is not as per DA and is extremely unsightly.

   As a result, we at 36 Shackel Avenue experience severe deterioration of the wonderful coastal views due to a large yellowish a/c box being erected on the roof. It is in our direct view from 2 balconies and a large window.

   The property block size allows for the a/c unit to be placed on the side of the property or elsewhere concealed from the roof line to comply with the council DA and stop our property value deterioration.

   Kind regards

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to Randwick City Council. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment