PlanningAlerts

4 Comments

Create an account or sign in to have your say by adding your own comment.

1. we think thjat 3 stories is not in keeping with streetscape and as parking a big problem now reducing car space is not appropiate

2. we think that 3 stories is too high and not in keeping with the streetscape..As parking a big problem already reducing private parking a bad idea

3. This is a very special train station village and so far has managed to remain more or less " as is ". I don't think that three stories is appropriate in this mainly two stories area. Car parking is a difficult situation throughout Stonnington and Council's policy of granting less than required needs to cease. We don't live in the immediate area but have been using the shops and cafes in the village since 1970. It's a very spewcial, quirky little area and Council needs to preserve and look after it.

4. No, please, not three stories, not four, not more. Not there. Even if the tertiary storey is set back from the street-scape, it will overlook houses to the north-side, which are predominantly single- or two-storey. It will be the first of many, am sure, and add to the dreadful tunnel effect that is now being experienced in areas such as High St Armadale west of Kooyong, Burwood Rd Hawthorn, and elsewhere. The Claremont street and Station street environs are integral to the heritage boast of Malvern area. Please don't start the decline.

Have your say on this application

Your comment and details will be sent to City of Stonnington. They may consider your submission when they decide whether to approve this application. Your name and comment will be posted publicly above.

Create an account or sign in to make a comment